A Novel Approach to Supporting Relationship-Centered Care Through Electronic Health Record Ergonomic Training in Preclerkship Medical Education

From Clinfowiki
Revision as of 02:04, 1 October 2015 by Sibekwe (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Introduction

An electronic health record (EHR) is a digital patient chart that consists of the patient’s health information, such as diagnosis, physician encounter, past medical history, medications, patient demographics, laboratory data, radiology imaging, and so on. https://www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/faqs/what-electronic-health-record-ehr This article evaluates the effectiveness of relationship-enhancing EHR ergonomics training in Preclerkship medical education at the University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix (COM-P).

Methods

40 second year medical student at COM-P were sampled during their preclerkship years in 2012. These students were required to have completed the Doctoring course with Standardized Patients (SP), where they were educated on “history taking, physical examination, presentation, and clinical reasoning skills.” The students were randomly separated into three groups, 13 student for Tuesday sessions, 12 students for Wednesday sessions, and 15 students for Thursday sessions.

The EHR training sessions were divided into four groups, which were conducted prior to Doctoring SP encounter:

  • DS1 - Two hour basic EHR training and pre-survey
  • DS2 - Introduction to laptop-based EHR (15 minute session).
  • DS3 - Introduction to laptop positioning optimization (15 minute session).
  • DS4 - Evaluation of DS2 & DS3.

Control I (Tuesday group) - Received DS1, no additional training, and no EHR provided during SP encounter. Control II (Wednesday group) - Received DS1, no additional training, and EHR provided during SP encounter. Treatment (Thursday group) - Received DS1, DS2, and DS3 with EHR provided during SP encounter.

A post-survey was then completed after each SP encounter.

Results

Pre and post-survey by the students indicated that an increment improvement with each subsequence session. DS1 vs DS2 = P< .05, DS1 vs DS3 = P< .01, DS1 vs DS4 = P< .001. Furthermore, using the linear regression model, it was determined that the estimated difference in pre and post-survey improvement between Control I and Control II, in terms of the student’s ability to effectively use the EHR while engaging the patient, was 0.31. While the estimated difference between Control II and Treatment was 1.23.

Conclusion

Utilization of EHRs was more effective in students who received additional training on EHR in a relationship-enhancing way, than in those with basic training. With the healthcare industry rapidly shifting toward EHR adoption, a significant impact towards easier unitization of EHRs can be achieved, if education is initiated at undergraduate or graduate medical academic level.

Though the study highlights the benefits of EHR ergonomics, it is limited in its real world application, in that; the same results may not be achieved in less controlled clinical environments, such as hospitals. In addition, the introduction of multidisciplinary nurses and allied health personnel can further affect the outcome of the study.

Appendix

This includes Pre-Survey, Post-Survey, EHR Ergonomic Training Materials, Student EHR Questionnaire, Standardized Patient EHR Questionnaire, Faculty EHR Questionnaire, and Statistical Analysis of EHR Use Improvement. file:///C:/Users/lawrence/Downloads/NIHMS584233-supplement-Supplemental_Digital_Content%20(1).pdf

Comments

Additional Comments

References