|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Clinical informaticians at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City, NY successfully revived a stalled [[Mark Mench EHR System Selection|EHR System Selection]] process using a framework that incorporating several factors:
| |
| − | #) Review of medical informatics literature to develop a mission statement, determine objectives, and guide the demonstration process
| |
| − | #) Investigation of vendor statements collected during the [[Request for Proposal]] phase, industry statements, other institution’s views of vendors,
| |
| − | #) Development of a user-centric selection and survey instrument specifically designed to assess user feedback,
| |
| − | #) Scientific analysis of validated findings and survey results at all steering committee meetings,
| |
| − | #) Assessment of the vendor's ability to support research by identifying funded and published research projects that were based on the vendors system,
| |
| − | #) Employing meticulous total cost of ownership analysis to assess and compare estimated costs of implementing vendor solution, and
| |
| − | #) Iterative meetings with stakeholders, executives and users to understand their needs, address their concerns and communicate the vision.
| |
| | | | |
| − | Based on article by:
| |
| − | Kannry J, Mukani S, Myers K. Using an Evidence Based Approach for System Selection at a Large Academic Medical Center: Lesson Learned in Selecting an Ambulatory EMR at Mount Sinai Hospital. [http://www.himss.org/ASP/publications_jhim_issue.asp?issue=3/1/2006 Journal of Health Information Management. 20(2): Spring 2006].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[Category:EHR]]
| |
