|
|
| (12 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | This is a review of Magid, Forrer, and Shaha’s 2012 article, Duplicate Orders: An Unintended Consequence of Computerized provider/physician order entry (CPOE) Implementation: Analysis and Mitigation Strategies <ref name="Magid et al 2012"> Magid, S., Forrer, C., & Shaha, S. (2012). Duplicate Orders: An Unintended Consequence of Computerized provider/physician order entry (CPOE) Implementation: Analysis and Mitigation Strategies. Applied Clinical Informatics, 3(4), 377–391. doi:10.4338/ACI-2012-01-RA-0002.</ref>
| + | #REDIRECT [[Duplicate orders: an unintended consequence of computerized provider/physician order entry (CPOE) implementation: analysis and mitigation strategies]] |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Background ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | The benefits of computerized provider/physician order entry (CPOE) have been. CPOE, particularly with clinical decision support (CDS), has been shown to increase patient safety. CPOE has also been reported to improve:<ref name="Magid et al 2012"></ref>
| + | |
| − | * The utilization of health care services
| + | |
| − | * Decrease costs
| + | |
| − | * Reduce hospital length of stay
| + | |
| − | * Decrease medical errors
| + | |
| − | * Improve compliance with guidelines
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | CPOE systems improve legibility and decrease errors relating to look-alike, sound-alike medications. Reductions in medication errors have been noted for:<ref name="Magid et al 2012"></ref>
| + | |
| − | * Dosing
| + | |
| − | * Frequency
| + | |
| − | * Route
| + | |
| − | * Substitution
| + | |
| − | * Allergies
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Improved prescribing practices with respect to use of proper drugs, dosing and timing have also been documented.<ref name="Magid et al 2012"></ref>
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == References==
| + | |
| − | <references/>
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[Category:CPOE]]
| + | |
| − | [[Category:Reviews]]
| + | |
