|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Interpretation systems present information to clinicians passively. These systems can create relatively simple, yet nicely formatted clinical laboratory reports and graphs, or sophisticated interpretations of such things as electrocardiograms (EKGs) [Klingeman, 1967]. Interpretation systems work best when interfaced directly to the data generated by laboratory instruments that produce numeric data. In addition, there should be a well understood physiologic model in existence which unambiguously interprets the data. These systems have found their greatest clinical utility in areas such as arterial blood gas interpretation [Gardner, 1975], spirometry [Ostler, 1984], and automated PAP smear analysis [Wilbur, 1998], to name just a few.
| + | #REDIRECT [[Interaction_model#Interpretation]] |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | # Klingeman J, Pipberger HV. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=5602708&query_hl=17 Computer classifications of electrocardiograms]. Comput Biomed Res 1967 Mar;1(1):1-17 | + | |
| − | # Gardner RM, Cannon GH, Morris AH, Olsen KR, Price WG: Computerized blood gas interpretation and reporting system. IEEE Computer 1975; 8:39-45.
| + | |
| − | # Ostler DV, Gardner RM, Crapo RO [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=6734156&query_hl=27 A computer system for analysis and transmission of spirometry waveforms using volume sampling]. Comput Biomed Res 1984 Jun;17(3):229-40.
| + | |
| − | # Wilbur DC, Prey MU, Miller WM, Pawlick GF, Colgan TJ. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=9479343&query_hl=25 The AutoPap system for primary screening in cervical cytology]. Comparing the results of a prospective, intended-use study with routine manual practice. Acta Cytol 1998 Jan-Feb;42(1):214-20 | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[Category:CDS]]
| + | |
