Difference between revisions of "Interpretation"
From Clinfowiki
(spam) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
# Ostler DV, Gardner RM, Crapo RO [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=6734156&query_hl=27 A computer system for analysis and transmission of spirometry waveforms using volume sampling]. Comput Biomed Res 1984 Jun;17(3):229-40. | # Ostler DV, Gardner RM, Crapo RO [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=6734156&query_hl=27 A computer system for analysis and transmission of spirometry waveforms using volume sampling]. Comput Biomed Res 1984 Jun;17(3):229-40. | ||
# Wilbur DC, Prey MU, Miller WM, Pawlick GF, Colgan TJ. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=9479343&query_hl=25 The AutoPap system for primary screening in cervical cytology]. Comparing the results of a prospective, intended-use study with routine manual practice. Acta Cytol 1998 Jan-Feb;42(1):214-20 | # Wilbur DC, Prey MU, Miller WM, Pawlick GF, Colgan TJ. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=9479343&query_hl=25 The AutoPap system for primary screening in cervical cytology]. Comparing the results of a prospective, intended-use study with routine manual practice. Acta Cytol 1998 Jan-Feb;42(1):214-20 | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 18:12, 30 December 2005
Interpretation systems present information to clinicians passively. These systems can create relatively simple, yet nicely formatted clinical laboratory reports and graphs, or sophisticated interpretations of such things as electrocardiograms (EKGs) [Klingeman, 1967]. Interpretation systems work best when interfaced directly to the data generated by laboratory instruments that produce numeric data. In addition, there should be a well understood physiologic model in existence which unambiguously interprets the data. These systems have found their greatest clinical utility in areas such as arterial blood gas interpretation [Gardner, 1975], spirometry [Ostler, 1984], and automated PAP smear analysis [Wilbur, 1998], to name just a few.
- Klingeman J, Pipberger HV. Computer classifications of electrocardiograms. Comput Biomed Res 1967 Mar;1(1):1-17
- Gardner RM, Cannon GH, Morris AH, Olsen KR, Price WG: Computerized blood gas interpretation and reporting system. IEEE Computer 1975; 8:39-45.
- Ostler DV, Gardner RM, Crapo RO A computer system for analysis and transmission of spirometry waveforms using volume sampling. Comput Biomed Res 1984 Jun;17(3):229-40.
- Wilbur DC, Prey MU, Miller WM, Pawlick GF, Colgan TJ. The AutoPap system for primary screening in cervical cytology. Comparing the results of a prospective, intended-use study with routine manual practice. Acta Cytol 1998 Jan-Feb;42(1):214-20
