Difference between revisions of "Leapfrog"

From Clinfowiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Reference)
 
Line 42: Line 42:
 
|Nuisance||Order with such a mild or typically inconsequential interaction that clinicians typically ignore the advice provided||Lasix AND Digoxin in patient with normal potassium  
 
|Nuisance||Order with such a mild or typically inconsequential interaction that clinicians typically ignore the advice provided||Lasix AND Digoxin in patient with normal potassium  
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
== Related papers ==
 +
 +
* [[Does the Leapfrog program help identify high-quality hospitals]]
  
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
 +
<references/>
  
 
The Leapfrog Group Fact Sheet.
 
The Leapfrog Group Fact Sheet.
Line 60: Line 65:
 
Peter Kilbridge, Emily Welebob, David Classen. Development of the Leapfrog methodology for evaluating hospital implemented inpatient computerized physician order entry systems. ''Quality and Safety in Health Care'' 2006(15): 81-84
 
Peter Kilbridge, Emily Welebob, David Classen. Development of the Leapfrog methodology for evaluating hospital implemented inpatient computerized physician order entry systems. ''Quality and Safety in Health Care'' 2006(15): 81-84
  
[[Category:OHSU-SP-06]]
 
 
 
This study was conducted to see whether  hospitals  that make improvements to their patient safety practices provide better care and achieve better outcomes for their patients. The Leapfrog Group was founded in 2000 and has gained lots of attention in healthcare industry  for its efforts to encourage hospitals to adopt evidence-based practices to improve patient safety. The focus of the study was to examine hospitals targeted by the Leapfrog Group, a coalition of 65 employers and agencies that purchase health care for approximately 34 million Americans.
 
 
The data studied was from the April 2006 '''Leapfrog Group''' survey of 1,860 hospitals in 29 regions, focusing on implementing computerized physician order entry (CPOE) systems, staffing intensive care units (ICUs) with intensivists (physicians specially trained in critical care) and relying on evidence in making referrals and treatment decisions. The researchers combined these data with the Hospital Quality Alliance's quality performance scores for management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), congestive heart failure (CHF), and pneumonia. Additional information on hospital characteristics and patient demographics from the American Hospital Association's annual survey and the 2003 Med PAR survey of Medicare beneficiaries were also taken into account. 1,860 hospitals were targeted by Leapfrog, 790 chose not to disclose their patient safety practices. The 682 hospitals that had begun to implement at least one Leapfrog patient safety practice tended to be larger, private not-for-profit, or teaching hospitals located in urban areas, compared with hospitals that did not report or had not implemented any of the practices.
 
 
Results indicated that hospitals that had begun to implement [[CPOE]] had higher performance on AMI and CHF measures than those that chose not to report. The differences were much smaller in pneumonia care though. It also indicated that hospitals with ICUs staffed with intensivists or those that used evidence-based referrals generally had better care for AMI and CHF. The hospitals that used these patient safety practices had lower risk-adjusted mortality rates for patients admitted with AMI or pneumonia.  These hospitals also had lower mortality rates for patients admitted with pneumonia. Mortality rates for CHF did not show much difference. Similar patterns were observed in hospitals staffed ICUs with intensivists and which used evidence-based referrals.
 
 
 
 
==Reference==
 
  
# Does the Leapfrog program help identify high-quality hospitals? Jha AK, Orav EJ, Ridgway AB, Zheng J, Epstein AM.Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18595377]
+
[[Category: OHSU-SP-06]]
 +
[[Category: CPOE]]

Latest revision as of 07:18, 21 February 2015

The Leapfrog Group is an alliance of over 170 large public and private organizations including many Fortune 500 companies that together spend “nearly $67 billion each year on health care for 36 million Americans in all 50 states.” The alliance was formed to utilize the combined purchasing power of the members to make giant “leaps” forward in improving the safety, quality and affordability of health care.

Because of the demonstrated potential benefits to improve patient safety, the Leapfrog Group adopted Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) as one of its safety standards.

What is the Leapfrog CPOE standard?

To meet the Leapfrog CPOE standard, a hospital must:

  1. Assure that at least 75% of medication orders are entered by physicians into a system that includes clinical decision support to prevent errors.
  2. Demonstrate that the system can alert physicians of at least 50% of common serious prescribing errors.
  3. Require that physicians electronically document a reason for overriding an alert.

A hospital certifies that it meets the second requirement by completing an independent test which consists of over 130 adult and over 50 pediatric order sets. The test addresses nine types of decision support for medication errors and three types of decision support that evaluate system efficiency. The twelve decision support categories are listed in the table below:

Source: Overview of the Leapfrog Group Evaluation Tool for Computerized Order Entry, Table 1
Decision Support Category Description Example
Therapeutic duplication Medication with therapeutic overlap with another new or active order; may be same drug, within drug class, or involve components of combination products Codeine AND Tylenol #3
Single and cumulative dose limits Medication with a specified dose that exceeds recommended dose ranges or that will result in a cumulative dose that exceeds recommended ranges Ten-fold excess dose of Methotrexate
Allergies and cross-allergies Medication for which patient allergy has been documented or allergy to other drug in same category has been documented Penicillin prescribed for patient with documented Penicillin allergy
Contraindicated route of administration Order specifying a route of administration (e.g., oral, intramuscular, intravenous) not appropriate for the identified medication Tylenol to be administered intravenously
Drug-drug and drug-food interactions Medication that results in known, dangerous interaction when administered in combination with a different medication in a new or existing order for the patient or results in an interaction in combination with a food or food group Digoxin AND Quinidine
Contraindication/dose limits based on patient diagnosis Medication either contraindicated based on patient diagnosis or diagnosis affects appropriate dosing Nonspecific beta blocker in patient with asthma
Contraindication dose limits based on patient age and weight Medication either contraindicated for this patient based on age and weight or for which age and weight must be considered in appropriate dosing Adult dose of antibiotic in a newborn
Contraindication/dose limits based on laboratory studies Medication either contraindicated for this patient based on laboratory studies or for which relevant laboratory results must be considered in appropriate dosing Normal adult dose regimen of renally eliminated medication in patient with elevated creatinine
Contraindication/dose limits based on radiology studies Medication contraindicated for this patient based on interaction with contrast medium in recent or ordered radiology study Medication prescribed known to interact with iodine to be used as contrast medium in ordered head CT exam
Corollary Intervention that requires an associated or secondary order to meet the standard of care Prompt to order drug levels when ordering aminoglycoside
Cost of care Test that duplicates a service within a timeframe in which there is typically minimal benefits from repeating the test Repeat test for Digoxin level within twp hours
Nuisance Order with such a mild or typically inconsequential interaction that clinicians typically ignore the advice provided Lasix AND Digoxin in patient with normal potassium

Related papers


References


The Leapfrog Group Fact Sheet. http://www.leapfroggroup.org/media/file/LF_FactSheet_01_26_06.pdf

The Leapfrog Group Mission Statement. http://www.leapfroggroup.org/about_us/our_mission

The Leapfrog Group CPOE Fact Sheet http://www.leapfroggroup.org/media/file/Leapfrog-Computer_Physician_Order_Entry_Fact_Sheet.pdf

Peter Kilbridge, Emily Welebob, David Classen. Overview of the Leapfrog Group Evaluation Tool for Computerized Physician Order Entry. December 2001 http://www.leapfroggroup.org/media/file/Leapfrog-CPOE_Evaluation.pdf

Peter Kilbridge, Emily Welebob, David Classen. Development of the Leapfrog methodology for evaluating hospital implemented inpatient computerized physician order entry systems. Quality and Safety in Health Care 2006(15): 81-84