Difference between revisions of "Teaching"
From Clinfowiki
(spam) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
# Teach RL, Shortliffe EH. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=7035062&query_hl=45 An analysis of physician attitudes regarding computer-based clinical consultation systems]. Comput Biomed Res 1981 Dec;14(6):542-58 | # Teach RL, Shortliffe EH. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=7035062&query_hl=45 An analysis of physician attitudes regarding computer-based clinical consultation systems]. Comput Biomed Res 1981 Dec;14(6):542-58 | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:CDS]] | ||
Revision as of 07:58, 14 January 2006
Any of the above mentioned interaction models can be enhanced by offering a "teaching mode" to the user. Such a mode would allow the system to "explain" its reasoning to the clinician. In a landmark article, Teach and Shortliffe stated that the ability of a system to "explain" its reasoning was one of the key factors in clinician acceptance of decision support systems [Teach, 1981]. Since that time many systems have been successfully deployed without this capability, although system developers are still encouraged to provide it when possible. Many developers skirt this issue by citing a scientific journal article or displaying the actual rules (along with the patient's data values) the system used to reach the conclusion.
- Teach RL, Shortliffe EH. An analysis of physician attitudes regarding computer-based clinical consultation systems. Comput Biomed Res 1981 Dec;14(6):542-58
