Difference between revisions of "The Influence that Electronic Prescribing has on Medication Errors and Preventable Adverse Drug Events: an Interrupted Time-Series Study"
(→Methods) |
(→Discussion) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
An interrupted time series study was used at two large teaching hospitals in the geriatric and internal medicine wards. The patients had to be admitted for at least 24 hours to be included in this study. Data was collected before implementation of CPOE and post-implementation. During the pre-implementation phase, there was no decision support system in place. During the intervention period, physicians used CPOE, during which CDSS was in place and helped to warn about dosaging, interactions, and allergies. During the CPOE process, physicians were able to override the order, despite some of the alerts. Medication errors and incidences of adverse drug effects were categorized into “prescribing” and “transcribing errors” and then “prescribing” errors were subdivided into “administrative” and “procedural” errors. | An interrupted time series study was used at two large teaching hospitals in the geriatric and internal medicine wards. The patients had to be admitted for at least 24 hours to be included in this study. Data was collected before implementation of CPOE and post-implementation. During the pre-implementation phase, there was no decision support system in place. During the intervention period, physicians used CPOE, during which CDSS was in place and helped to warn about dosaging, interactions, and allergies. During the CPOE process, physicians were able to override the order, despite some of the alerts. Medication errors and incidences of adverse drug effects were categorized into “prescribing” and “transcribing errors” and then “prescribing” errors were subdivided into “administrative” and “procedural” errors. | ||
| − | === | + | ===Results=== |
| − | + | Over 500 patients were enrolled in the pre-implementation stage of the study, while over 600 patients were enrolled in the post-implementation portion. Post-implementation of CPOE and CDSS showed a 40% reduction in medication errors. | |
===Conclusion=== | ===Conclusion=== | ||
Revision as of 00:09, 1 October 2015
This is a review on an article in which computerized physician order entry CPOE/clinical decision supportCDSS have been introduced and its effect on hospitals that have been entering orders using a paper system.[1]
Contents
Introduction
The purpose of this article was to determine the significance of electronic prescribing has on medication errors and preventing adverse effects. The expectation was that legibility of orders, orders that did not lack any of the necessary elements and including Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) into Care Provider Order Entry (CPOE) would help reduce medication errors, adverse effects, and increase medication safety.
Methods
An interrupted time series study was used at two large teaching hospitals in the geriatric and internal medicine wards. The patients had to be admitted for at least 24 hours to be included in this study. Data was collected before implementation of CPOE and post-implementation. During the pre-implementation phase, there was no decision support system in place. During the intervention period, physicians used CPOE, during which CDSS was in place and helped to warn about dosaging, interactions, and allergies. During the CPOE process, physicians were able to override the order, despite some of the alerts. Medication errors and incidences of adverse drug effects were categorized into “prescribing” and “transcribing errors” and then “prescribing” errors were subdivided into “administrative” and “procedural” errors.
Results
Over 500 patients were enrolled in the pre-implementation stage of the study, while over 600 patients were enrolled in the post-implementation portion. Post-implementation of CPOE and CDSS showed a 40% reduction in medication errors.
Conclusion
Utilization of CPOE/CDSS was a success in reduction medication errors, thus proving increase in patient safety. After initial adjustment to beginning the practice of CPOE then introducing CDSS, there was a significant decrease in medication errors, as well and increase in completeness of medication prescriptions.[1]
Comments
There is truth to be told when implementing a CPOE system, as I was present at many go-live instances for when the "swtich" of paper to electronic occurred, that many factors can and do effect the success of the project. I believe the authors captured some however I would also like to have known how much training was done and as well was the learning curve the same and did they implement the same EHR system at both facilities?
Related Article Review
1. Related article review: Cost-effectiveness of an electronic medication ordering system (CPOE/CDSS) in hospitalized patients
2. Related Article Review: Provider and pharmacist responses to warfarin drug–drug interaction alerts: a study of healthcare downstream of CPOE alerts
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 van Doormal JE, van den Bemut PMLA, Zeal RJ, Egberts ACG, Lenderink BW, Kosterink JGW, Haaijer-Rukamp FM, Mol PGM, 1 November 2009, The Influence that Electronic Prescribing has on Medication Errors and Preventable Adverse Drug Events: an Interrupted Time-Series Study,JAMIA 16,6,816-825 http://jamia.oxfordjournals.org/content/16/6/816,/,
