Difference between revisions of "Criteria for creating new order sets"
From Clinfowiki
(→Related Articles) |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Related Articles== | ==Related Articles== | ||
[[Data-driven order set generation and evaluation in the pediatric environment.|Data-driven order set generation and evaluation in the pediatric environment.]] | [[Data-driven order set generation and evaluation in the pediatric environment.|Data-driven order set generation and evaluation in the pediatric environment.]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Making Sense of Clinical Practice: Order Set Design Strategies in CPOE]] | ||
[[Category:CPOE]] | [[Category:CPOE]] | ||
[[Category:CDS]] | [[Category:CDS]] | ||
[[Category:Order Sets]] | [[Category:Order Sets]] |
Revision as of 04:43, 15 October 2015
Criteria
- Usage rates of the legacy order sets, i.e. those that demonstrated heavy usage in the past were updated and implemented in the new system;
- Top DRGs, i.e. we attempted to create order sets for the most common DRGs;
- CMS quality measures, i.e. order sets to drive compliance with CHF, CAP, AMI, etc... standards;
- Internal Quality Data, i.e. those areas that demonstrated opportunity for quality improvement because of "unusual occurrences" or sentinel events were candidates for order sets;
- "Leave no specialty behind" philosophy, i.e. each specialty would have at least one order set at the time of the rollout.
Related Articles
Data-driven order set generation and evaluation in the pediatric environment.
Making Sense of Clinical Practice: Order Set Design Strategies in CPOE