Difference between revisions of "A clinical decision support needs assessment of community-based physicians"
(→Methods) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Methods== | ==Methods== | ||
| + | The authors designed this study around aspects of human-computer interaction framework. They analyzed the data using the grounded theory method. They had 2 research questions (1) How do community-based physicians conceptualize CDS? (2) What do community-based physicians need from CDS?<ref name="A clinical decision support needs assessment of community-based physicians">A clinical decision support needs assessment of community-based physicians.http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxyhost.library.tmc.edu/pmc/articles/PMC3241161/</ref> | ||
==Results== | ==Results== | ||
Revision as of 02:58, 1 April 2015
This article was to conduct an assessment on community based physicians and their views on clinical decision support and the desired capabilities that could assist physicians in the future in community based practices by Joshua E Richardson and Joan S. Ash.[1]
Abstract
Objective
Methods
The authors designed this study around aspects of human-computer interaction framework. They analyzed the data using the grounded theory method. They had 2 research questions (1) How do community-based physicians conceptualize CDS? (2) What do community-based physicians need from CDS?[1]
Results
Discussion
Physicians identified different aspects that needed more work such as medication administration and treatment and cognitive decision-making that would enhance relationships and interactions with the patient and staff.
Conclusion
Physicians expressed a need for clinical decision support. To fully meet this the clinical decision support tool must fully integrate the functions that align time and resources to assist the physician in a wide range of decisions.[1]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 A clinical decision support needs assessment of community-based physicians.http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezproxyhost.library.tmc.edu/pmc/articles/PMC3241161/
