Difference between revisions of "Clinfowiki talk:About"

From Clinfowiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Results)
(Blanked the page)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== EHR issues in Critical Access Hospitals ==
 
  
Implementation of an EHR is an overwhelming task no matter where it is done.  However, achieving this task in a critical access hospital (defined as a hospital that provides 24-hour emergency services with less than 25 acute care and swing beds and is more than 35 miles from another hospital) with limited resources is more challenging.  A recent study addressing this issue is EHR Implementation Advice to Critical Access Hospitals from Peer Experts and Other Key Informants http://aci.schattauer.de/en/contents/archive/issue/1824/manuscript/20820.html].
 
 
== Methods ==
 
 
Participants:
 
16 peer experts
 
3 vendor representatives
 
7 implementation experts
 
6 EHR consultants
 
3 CAH Regional Extension Center representatives
 
4 researchers in clinical informatics and HIT policy
 
2 national EHR policy stakeholders
 
 
Questions:
 
1  "What are the things you'd want to know most about planning and preparation processes for EHR implementation at CAHs?  Name two."
 
2  "What advice would you give CAHs on the planning and preparation processes for EHR implementation?"
 
 
== Results ==
 
 
 
19 themes, ranked in order of number of times mentioned, from expert comments:
 
EHR Team
 
Communication
 
Clinician/Physician Buy-in/Ownership
 
Budget/Financial Resources
 
EHR System Selection
 
Preparatory Work
 
Technology
 
Optimization/Ongoing Work
 
Outside Partners/Information Resources
 
EHR Training/Go-live Support
 
Workflow/Productivity
 
Project Management
 
Purpose/Goals
 
Leadership
 
Change/Encouragement
 
Policy/Meaningful Use
 
Governance
 
System Install/Go-live
 
Clinical Decision Support/Knowledge Management
 
 
'''Reoccuring Suggestions that Crossed Multiple Themes'''
 
 
Although some suggestions were specific to a theme, it is interesting that some suggestions were given with multiple themes.  These included the suggestion that a group from the CAH travel to see each EHR in use at another CAH before purchase.  This delegation should include key stakeholders at the institution as well as end-point users.  The delegates should meet with their peers at the CAH already running the system and elicit comments about build, go-live, vendor support, difficulties, resolution of those difficulties, and ongoing use. 
 
 
It was also mentioned across several themes to involve all departments including those who will use the system on a day to day basis, not just management.  These employees can often give better feedback on how the system will work in the daily operations than department managers can.
 
 
 
== Discussion ==
 

Latest revision as of 22:41, 17 October 2015