Difference between revisions of "Main Page/Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes"
From Clinfowiki
Anita Bandri (Talk | contribs) (Created page with "This is a systematic review of the randomized controlled trials comparing Remote Monitoring (RM) with In-office (IO) follow-up of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD).") |
Anita Bandri (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is a systematic review of the randomized controlled trials comparing Remote Monitoring (RM) with In-office (IO) follow-up of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD). | This is a systematic review of the randomized controlled trials comparing Remote Monitoring (RM) with In-office (IO) follow-up of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD). | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Background== | ||
| + | Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) have become the standard of care therapy for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. | ||
Revision as of 17:07, 6 November 2015
This is a systematic review of the randomized controlled trials comparing Remote Monitoring (RM) with In-office (IO) follow-up of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD).
Background
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) have become the standard of care therapy for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death.
