Main Page/Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes

From Clinfowiki
Revision as of 17:25, 6 November 2015 by Anita Bandri (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

This article is a systematic review of the randomized controlled trials comparing Remote Monitoring (RM) with In-office (IO) follow-up of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD).[1]

Background

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) have become the standard of care therapy for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Remote monitoring (RM) of ICD devices has been proposed as an alternative strategy to reduce the need for routine device follow-up visits while providing continuous surveillance and immediate problem notification.



References

  1. N. Parthiban, A. Esterman, R. Mahajan, D. J. Twomey, R. K. Pathak, D. H. Lau, K. C. Roberts-Thomson, G. D. Young, P. Sanders, A. N. Ganesan. Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jun 23;65(24):2591-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.029. Epub 2015 May 13.http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxyhost.library.tmc.edu/science/article/pii/S0735109715020306