Difference between revisions of "Talk:Virginia"
From Clinfowiki
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What about calling this page "Virginia EHR study" and categorize the page as an EHR study? For info on using categories, see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Category Wikipedia:category] --[[User:Arildf|Arildf]] 01:30, 10 January 2006 (CST) | What about calling this page "Virginia EHR study" and categorize the page as an EHR study? For info on using categories, see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Category Wikipedia:category] --[[User:Arildf|Arildf]] 01:30, 10 January 2006 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I like the idea of categories. I'm not sure that this is an EHR study. I think study used this way implies a result rather than the act of studying the EHR. What about EHR Task Forces or something like that? | ||
Latest revision as of 04:27, 11 January 2006
What about calling this page "Virginia EHR study" and categorize the page as an EHR study? For info on using categories, see Wikipedia:category --Arildf 01:30, 10 January 2006 (CST)
I like the idea of categories. I'm not sure that this is an EHR study. I think study used this way implies a result rather than the act of studying the EHR. What about EHR Task Forces or something like that?
